Legal Opinion

In Re City of Medina

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1966No. 39022PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHunter, J.

This appeal arises from a proceeding instituted by the city of Medina, plaintiff (respondent), to condemn two parcels of land owned by George W. Olson (deceased) and Ray W. Brady, defendants (appellants). W. H. Cook, as executor of the estate of George W. Olson, has been substituted as a party defendant for the deceased Mr. Olson.

The right of public use and necessity having been determined previously, the trial court, sitting without a jury, had as its sole concern the question of determining the just compensation to be awarded the defendants for the city’s taking of their respective parcels…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wayland v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  2. State ex rel. Merriam v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Town of Issaquah v. GordonWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Port of Seattle v. BlatzWashington Supreme Court · 1961

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. RothWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Lange v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  3. State v. SherrillCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
  4. Dahl-Smyth, Inc. v. City of Walla WallaWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Dahl-Smyth, Inc. v. City of Walla WallaWashington Supreme Court · 2003

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API