Legal Opinion

State v. Calkins

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1957No. 33980PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinley, J.

This is an eminent domain proceeding brought by the state of Washington to condemn and appropriate a right of way across the premises of the defendants, pursuant to RCW 8.04.010 et seq., for the purpose of constructing a new limited-access highway under the provisions of RCW 47.52.010 et seq. The proposed new limited-access highway (designated as part of secondary state highway No. 11-G) extends a distance of approximately five miles from Ephrata to secondary state highway No. 11-G, which connects Soap Lake and Moses Lake in Grant county.

*718The land condemned is a part of the defendants’…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. BurkOregon Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Carazalla v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Donaldson v. GreenwoodWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  4. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. ClevengerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  5. Walker v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1956

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. State v. ThelbergArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Brock v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1965
  3. Riddle v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  4. Thomsen v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  5. St. Clair County v. BukacekSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API