Legal Opinion
Klodek v. May Creek Logging Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Decided January 21, 1913No. 10653PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Myers, J., entered July 13, 1912, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, for personal injuries sustained by an employee in a logging camp.
1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.
Paul Klodek sought employment at the office of an employment agency in the city of Seattle. He was furnished with transportation to the defendant’s logging camp, and given a memorandum of his employment for presentation to the company. The memorandum is as follows:
“Seattle, Wash., Feb. 81, 1910.
“Received from Paul Klodek the sum of ($1) one dollar, for which we agree to furnish correct information by which he shall secure a position as bucker with May Creek Logging Co., Kennydale, on order received at 1 o’clock M. on the............day of Feb. 81, 1910, wages $3 per day. Board, $5 per wk.…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Wayland v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- Borg v. BringhurstWashington Supreme Court · 1919
- Bennett v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1945
- St. Louis Car Co. v. Glover Equipment Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
- Vanderboget v. Campbell Mill Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914