Legal Opinion

In Re Myron Farber

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided September 21, 1978PublishedCited by 98 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

78 N.J. 259 (1978)

394 A.2d 330

IN THE MATTER OF MYRON FARBER AND THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY, CHARGED WITH CONTEMPT OF COURT, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF,

v.

MARIO E. JASCALEVICH, DEFENDANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued September 5, 1978.

Decided September 21, 1978.

Mr. Floyd Abrams of the New York Bar argued the cause for appellants Myron Farber and The New York Times Company (Messrs. Winne, Banta, Rizzi and Harrington, attorneys; Mr. Peter G. Banta, Mr. Donald A. Klein, and Messrs. Cahill, Gordon and Reindel of the New York Bar, of counsel; Mr. Raymond L. Falls,…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent · Pashman; Dissent · Handler.

2Cases cited71 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by98 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  2. State v. SchmidSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  3. Steaks Unlimited, Inc. v. Donna Deaner and Wtae-Tv4 and Hearst CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
  4. Maressa v. New Jersey MonthlySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  5. State v. LashinskySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979

93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API