Legal Opinion

In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Christopher Robert WALSH, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 199813

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 23, 2015No. A14-213PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility (the Director) filed a petition for disciplinary action against respondent Christopher Robert Walsh, alleging, among other things, that Walsh engaged in dilatory behavior; failed to communicate.with clients; acted in,bad faith; made a false statement to opposing counsel; and chronically violated court orders and court rules, resulting in lost claims. , The referee concluded that Walsh’s conduct violated the Minnesota Rules of Professional Conduct, found several aggravating factors,, and recommended that Walsh be…

3Cases cited17 opinions

  1. In re Disciplinary Action Against ColemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  2. In Re Disciplinary Action Against RebeauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  3. In re Disciplinary Action Against UlanowskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  4. In re Disciplinary Action Against LundeenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  5. Gjovik v. StropeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by7 opinions

  1. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Kathryn S. BarnhillSupreme Court of Iowa · 2016
  2. In re Disciplinary Action Against SeaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2019
  3. In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Robert D. STONEBURNER, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0105909Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
  4. In re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against George E. HulstrandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
  5. In re Eichhorn-HicksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API