Legal Opinion

In re Eichhorn-Hicks

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 25, 2018No. A17-1039PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility filed a petition for disciplinary action against respondent Tracy R. Eichhorn-Hicks. After an evidentiary hearing, the referee concluded that Eichhorn-Hicks committed professional misconduct by (1) not stating in a written fee agreement that the fee could be subject to a refund; (2) failing to communicate a plea agreement to a client; and (3) signing his client's name on a medical-records release form, falsely signing as a witness to his client's signature, and then presenting the signed release to a third party. The referee…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. In Re Disciplinary Action Against NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  2. In Re Disciplinary Action Against RebeauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  3. In re Disciplinary Action Against UlanowskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  4. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against GrahamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  5. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against RooneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Samuel A. McCloud, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0069693. ...Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2025
  2. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Tracy R. Eichhorn-HicksWisconsin Supreme Court · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API