Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Short

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 22, 1969No. 699DC460PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGem-iam, J.

By stipulation during the hearing, the mother abandoned any claim she may have had to the custody of her daughter. It then followed that the father alone had the natural and legal right to the'custody of the child unless for substantial and sufficient reasons it was determined that the interest and welfare of the child required that he be denied that right. Wilson v. Wilson, 269 N.C. 676, 153 S.E. 2d 349; Holmes v. Sanders, 246 N.C. 200, 97 S.E. 2d 683; James v. Pretlow, 242 N.C. 102, 86 S.E. 2d 759; Tyner v. Tyner, 206 N.C. 776, 175 S.E. 144. “. . . [T]he welfare of the infants themselves is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. James v. PretlowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  2. Hinkle v. HinkleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  3. Tyner v. TynerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  4. Wilson v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. In Re McCraw ChildrenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brandon v. BrandonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Ingle v. IngleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API