Legal Opinion
Tyner v. Tyner
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided June 20, 1934PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtScblenck, J.
The appellant makes six assignments of error which we will discuss seriatim.
*778“1. That bis Honor erred in signing tbe judgment set out in the record.” In plaintiff’s brief she takes the position that the court was without jurisdiction in this action to determine the custody of the children. We think this untenable. The plaintiff instituted this action under C. S., 1664, which provides that in actions for divorce, either absolute or from bed and board, the judge both before and afte'r final judgment may make orders respecting the care and custody of children. The court acquired jurisdiction of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re HamiltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
- Newsome v. . BunchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
- In Re LewisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
- Patrick Ex Rel. Michal v. BryanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- Shoaf v. Frost.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
3Cited by22 opinions
- Crosby v. CrosbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Adams v. TessenerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
- Blackley v. BlackleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- James v. PretlowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Griffin v. GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.