Wilson v. Wilson
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtPless, J.
While it is true that a parent, if a fit and suitable person, is entitled to the custody of his child, it is equally true that where fitness and suitability are absent he loses this right. “Where there are unusual circumstances and the best interest of the child justifies such action, a court may refuse to award custody to either the mother or father and instead award the custody of the child to grandparents or others. There may be occasions where even 'a parent’s love must yield to another if after judicial investigation it is found that the best interest of the child is subserved thereby.’…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- James v. PretlowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Griffin v. GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Thomas v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Tyner v. TynerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- Kovacs v. BrewerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Matter of MontgomerySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- In re P.L.P.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- Price v. HowardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
- Adams v. TessenerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
- Spence v. DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.