Legal Opinion

Commissioner of Transportation v. Larobina

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided October 18, 2005No. AC 24780PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LAVERY, C. J.

The defendant, Vincent P. Larobina, appeals from the judgment of the trial court following a reassessment of the damages due to the defendant for a partial condemnation of a portion of his real property. The defendant claims on appeal that the court improperly (1) failed to give effect to the express language describing the subject taking in the notice of condemnation, (2) failed to declare, sua sponte, that the taking was void ab initio pursuant to General Statutes (Rev. to 1999) § 13a-73 (b) and (3) assessed the damages due without applying generally accepted methods of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Kelo v. City of New LondonSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. Andrews v. CoxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
  3. Peters v. Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  4. Kelo v. City of New LondonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  5. D'ADDARIO v. Commissioner of TransportationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Suffield Development Associates Ltd. Partnership v. National Loan Investors, L.P.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  2. New England Estates, LLC v. Town of BranfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  3. St. Germain v. LaBrieConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  4. Eisenberg v. TuchmanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  5. Roy Sastrom v. Psychiatric Security Review BoardConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API