Legal Opinion
Stanley Works v. New Britain Redevelopment Agency
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 10, 1967PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThim, J.
On or about November 25, 1964, the defendant, acting under § 8-129 of the General Statutes, filed with the clerk of the Superior Court at Hartford five statements of compensation as against the plaintiff stating that the premises therein described were found to be located in the South Central Project, a redevelopment area in New Britain, and that the compensation to be paid for the premises was to be $1,000,000. Thereafter, on December 8, 1964, the defendant caused to be filed in the office of the town clerk of New Britain five certificates of taking as to the premises. See General Statutes §…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Town of Winchester v. CoxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
- Morgan v. HillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Moss v. New Haven Redevelopment AgencySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- Salvatore v. HaydenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Collens v. New Canaan Water Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Ullmann v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Budney v. IvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.