Legal Opinion

Hartman v. Stumbo

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 11, 1965No. 44,229PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harman, C.:

This appeal involves the application of statutes of limitation to a damage action brought by appellant against appellee, her former attorney.

Appellant’s petition, filed August 12, 1964, alleged in substance that on March 23, 1961, she consulted appellee about preparing her will; that appellee falsely and fraudulently represented to her that because her husband, James C. Hartman, had recently died intestate she could not execute a will until her husband’s estate was first probated, although appellee knew her husband had died intestate and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Schreffler v. BowlesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946
  2. Brick v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1965
  3. Milton E. Dam and Everett S. Dam, Co-Partners Doing Business Under the Firm Name and Style of Dam Brothers v. General Electric Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
  4. Carpenter v. Rohm & Haas Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1948

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Great Plains Trust Co. v. Union Pacific RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
  2. Taiwo v. Kim Phan Thi VuSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
  3. Hecht v. First National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1971
  4. Gilley Ex Rel. Gilley v. FarmerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1971
  5. Goforth v. Franklin Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API