Teeter v. Brown
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBridges, J.
The plaintiff appeals from a judgment dismissing his suit, after a demurrer to the complaint had been sustained. That instrument is so long that we cannot do more than here give its substance, construing it most favorably for the appellant. The facts, as alleged, are as follows:
Very early in January, 1901, the appellant was preparing to locate claim No. 1, below discovery, on Little Creek, in the Nome, Alaska, mining district. The intention was that his location would be for himself and a Mrs. England, who was his close friend. Respondent, a comparative stranger, learned that the location was…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Noyes v. ParsonsWashington Supreme Court · 1919
- Ferrell v. LordWashington Supreme Court · 1906
3Cited by21 opinions
- United States v. Consolidated Mines & Smelting Co., Ltd., & Hugh Brown, United States of America v. Consolidated Mines & Smelting Co., Ltd., and Hugh BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
- United States v. Consolidated Mines & Smelting Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
- McKnight v. BasilidesWashington Supreme Court · 1943
- Milton E. Dam and Everett S. Dam, Co-Partners Doing Business Under the Firm Name and Style of Dam Brothers v. General Electric Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
- Waldrip v. Olympia Oyster Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1952
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.