Legal Opinion
Sullivan v. Oracle Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 13, 2011No. 06-56649PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:
Oracle Corporation (“Oracle”), a large software company, has employed hundreds of workers to train Oracle customers in the use of its software. During the period relevant to this suit, Oracle classified these workers as teachers who were not entitled to compensation for overtime work under either federal or California law. Three nonresidents of California brought a would-be class action against Oracle seeking damages under California law for failure to pay overtime. Plaintiffs performed only some of their work for Oracle in California. Plaintiffs’ first two…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. ShuttsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Allstate Insurance v. HagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Burnside v. Kiewit Pacific Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Sullivan v. Oracle Corp.California Supreme Court · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Intl Brotherhood of Teamsters v. FmcsaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Hirst v. Skywest, Inc.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2017
- AT & T Mobility LLC v. AU Optronics Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- W. States Trucking Ass'n v. SchoorlDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
- Bernstein v. Virgin America, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2017
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.