Legal Opinion

Cucuk v. Payne

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 18, 1956No. Civ. 4994PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CONLEY, J. pro tem. *

Plaintiff was severely injured while crossing Tulare Street at “R” Street in the city of Fresno, when he was struck by an automobile driven by Bill Dean Payne and owned by William A. Payne. The jury brought in a verdict for the defendants and plaintiff appeals.

Appellant first claims that the verdict was based on incredible testimony which was “contrary to the laws of nature”; secondly, that certain instructions given by the court were erroneous; and thirdly, that the court erred in refusing some of plaintiff’s proposed instructions.

On the first point, our inquiry must be…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Teel v. GaskillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Tupman v. HaberkernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Satterlee v. Orange Glenn School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Alarid v. VanierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Chadek v. SpiraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  3. Rogers v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. Bettencourt v. Direct Transportation Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. Flynn v. WallaceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API