Legal Opinion

Bettencourt v. Direct Transportation Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 30, 1962No. Civ. 141PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STONE, J.—

Defendants appeal from an order granting plaintiffs’ motion for a new trial following a jury verdict for defendants. Plaintiffs’ son, driving their Jeep station wagon, collided with defendants’ truck and trailer loaded with shingles. The accident occurred at 8 p. m. April 15, 1959, on Highway 41 in Madera County. The locale is in the foothills or lower mountain area near the town of Oakhurst. At the point of impact the highway runs generally north and south. Defendants had stopped on the easterly side of the highway and were in the process of crossing the roadway from east to west…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Aced v. Hobbs-Sesack Plumbing Co.California Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Brandelius v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Shaw v. Pacific Greyhound LinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Odell v. FruehCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. Taylor v. Pacific Container Co.California Court of Appeal · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jacuzzi v. Jacuzzi Bros., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1966
  2. Kelly v. Hartford Casualty Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Heavy Duty Truck Leasing, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API