Legal Opinion
Chadek v. Spira
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 28, 1956No. Civ. 21770PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFox, J.
Defendant appeals from a judgment in favor of plaintiff after a verdict in a personal injury action arising out of an intersection collision.
Defendant assigns as prejudicial error the giving of five instructions.
- The accident occurred around 5 p. m. on August 21, 1954, at the intersection of Crenshaw Boulevard and Rodeo Road, in the city of Los Angeles. Crenshaw is a six-lane thoroughfare running in a north-south direction, and is approximately 72 feet wide in the area here involved. Rodeo Road, which is 56 feet wide, is laid out in an east-west direction. The intersection was controlled by…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- In Re the Estate of NelsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Kastel v. StieberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Kircher v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1948
- Risley v. LenwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- People v. NewcomerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hom v. ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Willard v. HutsonOregon Supreme Court · 1963
- DeGeorge v. CrimminsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Leslie Salt Co. v. St. Paul Mercury InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Leslie Salt Co. v. St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company, a Corporation, Defendant/third Partyplaintiff/appellant, Fm Insurance Co., Ltd., a Corporation, Third Party Leslie Salt Co. v. St. Paul Mercury Insurance Co., a Corporation, and Fm Insurance Company, Ltd., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981