Legal Opinion

Flynn v. Wallace

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 10, 1959No. Civ. No. 23646PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

NOURSE, J. pro tem.*

This is an action to recover damages for personal injury. The defendant Wallace appeals from a judgment based upon the verdict of the jury in favor of plaintiff.

The sole ground for the appeal is the refusal of the court to give an instruction requested by the defendant.1

We have reached the conclusion that the judgment must be affirmed.

The Pleadings

By his complaint plaintiff alleged that he was a passenger in a certain Dodge vehicle which was proceeding in a westerly direction on Glenoaks Boulevard in the process of making a left-hand turn to go south on Central Avenue in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Buckley v. ChadwickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Campagna v. Market Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Nelson v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Royko v. Griffith Co.California Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. Cucuk v. PayneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pemberton v. Ince Brothers Pipeline Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API