Legal Opinion
Zeidman v. General Accident Insurance
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 26, 1988No. 85 CIV. 6615 (PKL)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LEISURE, District Judge:
Plaintiff, Molly Zeidman, brought this action on August 1, 1985, to recover under a no-fault insurance policy for injuries incurred in a motor vehicle accident. Plaintiff died on August 31, 1986. At present, there has been no substitution of a proper party to replace the now deceased Zeidman. Defendant General Accident Insurance Company (“General Accident”) now moves pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 25(a)(1) to dismiss this action for failure to substitute a proper party within the applicable 90 day period. Plaintiff has crossmoved pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Denis Rende v. Alfred S. KayCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
- Yonofsky v. WernickDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973
- Al-Jundi v. RockefellerDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1980
- Ashley v. Illinois Central Gulf RailroadDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1983
- Colgate-Palmolive Co. v. North American Chemical Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1964
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Richard Zanowick v. Baxter Healthcare Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Moseley v. Eighth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 2008
- Kasting v. American Family Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2000
- Kernisant v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2005
- George v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.