Legal Opinion

Richard Zanowick v. Baxter Healthcare Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 9, 2017No. 15-56034, 15-56047PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

OWENS, Circuit Judge:

Defendants-Appellants Baxter Healthcare Corporation and Fisher Scientific Company, LLC (collectively, defendants) appeal from the district court’s order granting Plaintiffs-Appellees Richard Za-nowick and Joan Clark-Zanowick’s (collectively, Zanowick or plaintiffs) motion to voluntarily dismiss their action without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2). Defendants argue that the district court should have dismissed the action with prejudice due to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(a)(1). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Semtek International Inc. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Walter Bateman v. United States Postal Service William J. Henderson, 1 Postmaster General, and Aaron Johnson Ben Fukumitsu David Burns Jose MallariCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  3. Anderson v. YungkauSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Brian Barlow v. George Ground, Officer 9129 L.O. Oberlies, Officer 1706 A. Tucker, Officer 9363 Ray Shay, Officer 3269Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  5. Smith v. LenchesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Gustavo Lizarazo v. Miami-Dade Corrections and Rehabilitation DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017
  2. Kryder v. EstateDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2017
  3. (PC) Cantu v. WardDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
  4. (PC) Cato v. DarstDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  5. (PC) Duran v. BurnsDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API