Legal Opinion

Moseley v. Eighth Judicial District Court

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 2008No. 49533PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

In this original petition we consider two primary issues with regard to petitioner’s NRCP 25 motion to dismiss a deceased plaintiff’s loss of consortium claim. First, we address whether a defendant party who files a suggestion of death on the record is required to name a successor or personal representative for the deceased plaintiff to trigger NRCP 25’s 90-day limitation period. We clarify that a suggestion of a plaintiff’s death filed by a defendant is generally sufficient to trigger the 90-day limitation period within which the remaining plaintiffs or the deceased party’s successor…

3Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Round Hill General Improvement District v. NewmanNevada Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Anderson v. YungkauSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Smith v. Eighth Judicial District Court of State of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Denis Rende v. Alfred S. KayCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
  5. Yonofsky v. WernickDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by44 opinions

  1. Ogawa v. OgawaNevada Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Webb Ex Rel. Webb v. Clark County SchoolNevada Supreme Court · 2009
  3. McKnight Family, LLP v. Adept Management Services, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Gonor v. DaleNevada Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Lytle v. Rosemere Estates Property Owners Ass'nNevada Supreme Court · 2013

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API