Legal Opinion

Renner v. Huntington-Hawthorne Oil & Gas Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1952No. L. A. 21759PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.

Plaintiff, the owner of fee title to certain real property, obtained judgment quieting her title as against defendants, who claim under an oil and gas lease. This is an appeal by the defendants. Plaintiff’s position, which was accepted by the trial court, is that the term of the lease has expired. We have concluded that this position is correct, but that, because the lessee held over after the expiration of the lease and the lessor continued to accept royalty payments, there arose a tenancy from month to month which has not yet been terminated.

On April 23, 1921, plaintiff’s predecessor in…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Watson v. RochmillTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Tanner v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Dabney v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Colyear v. TobrinerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Agar v. WinslowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. McCullough Oil, Inc. v. RezekWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Brown v. HaightSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  3. Victory Oil Co. v. Hancock Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Renner v. Huntington Etc. Oil & Gas Co.California Supreme Court · 1952
  5. In re LandSource Communities, Development LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2013

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API