Brown v. Haight
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Jones,
In this case we are again called upon to interpret an oil and gas “lease” containing the traditional “in paying quantities” habendum clause.
The “lease” in question was executed in 1927 and contained the following provisions: “Witnesseth: That the Grantors, in consideration of the sum of one dollar paid by the Grantee ... do hereby grant and convey nnto the grantee, all the oil and gas in and under the following described tract of land, and also all the said tract of land for the sole and only purpose and with the exclusive right of drilling and operation thereon…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Smith v. Glen Alden Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- C. C. Duke and C. T. Duke v. Sun Oil Company and Pan American Petroleum CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
- Barnsdall v. Bradford Gas Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
- Cassell v. CrothersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
- White v. YoungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- TW Phillips Gas and Oil Co. v. JedlickaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Prime Medica Associates v. Valley Forge Insurance Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- E. C. Ernst, Inc., in No. 79-2290 v. Koppers Company, Inc., in Nos. 79-2184, 79-2320Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- McCullough Oil, Inc. v. RezekWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1986
- McCausland v. WagnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.