Legal Opinion

Bynum v. Shatto

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided August 29, 1974No. 885PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*809OPINION

NYE, Chief Justice.

This is a suit on a debt evidenced by a judgment rendered by the 127th District Court of Harris County on a promissory note. The judgment was more than ten (10) years old at the time this suit was filed. No execution was ever issued on the judgment. This case was tried to the court without a jury. At the conclusion of the evidence, the court ruled that the cause of action of the plaintiff, David Bynum, was barred by limitations and, therefore, the plaintiff should take nothing in his lawsuit. It is from this judgment that the plaintiff has perfected his appeal.

The…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sanders v. HarderTexas Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co. v. Commercial Standard Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Gordon v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  4. Schindler v. Ag Aero Distributors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  5. Sprouse v. TEXAS EMPLOYERS'INSURANCE ASSOCIATIONCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Michael v. Dyke, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2001
  2. Taylor v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  3. Esparza v. DiazCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
  4. Employers Insurance of Wausau v. Halton, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1990
  5. Birdo v. HolbrookCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API