Legal Opinion
Michael v. Dyke
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
Decided April 19, 2001No. 13-99-533-CVPublishedCited by 114 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DORSEY, Justice.
This is an appeal from a summary judgment. Murray Michael and STEP, Inc. 2 sued Dr. Lester Dyke and others for various causes of action stemming from the circumstances surrounding the business competition between the parties.
Michael is a licensed perfusionist and also a principal in STEP, Inc., a business that provides perfusion services to hospitals. A perfusionist is a medical technician who operates the heart and lung machines during open heart surgery. With a partner, Michael formed the business, STEP, Inc., to provide perfusion services. That corporation employs…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- McConnell v. Southside Independent School DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- Gulbenkian v. PennTexas Supreme Court · 1952
- Natividad v. Alexsis, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1994
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by114 opinions
- Ortega v. City National Bank, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2003
- Meru v. Huerta, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2004
- Bartosh v. Sam Houston State University, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2008
- Imkie v. Methodist Hospital, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2010
- Adams v. Reynolds Tile and Flooring, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003
109 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.