Legal Opinion
Esparza v. Diaz
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided November 29, 1990No. C14-89-01086-CVPublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CORRECTED OPINION
ELLIS, Justice.
This is an appeal from the dismissal of appellant’s pro se in forma pauperis action as frivolous under § 13.001 Tex.Civ. PRACTICES Annd. Remedies Code (Vernon Supp. 1989). We affirm.
Appellant, Edward Esparza, an inmate in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, brought suit “pro se” and “in forma pauperis” against Sgt. Juan Diaz and unidentified others for an alleged violation of appellant’s civil rights. Appellant brought this civil action under the auspices of Article 39.021 of the Texas Penal Code. (Vernon 1989). Upon motion…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Isiah Carl Green v. Dan v. McKaskle Acting Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- Sanders v. HarderTexas Supreme Court · 1950
- Bagg v. University of Texas Medical Branch at GalvestonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Baker v. StoryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Harris County v. OchoaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Boozier v. Hambrick, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1993
- Whitehead v. University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1993
- Bowles v. Reed, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1996
- Holland Ex Rel. Holland v. City of HoustonDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1999
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.