Legal Opinion

Birdo v. Holbrook

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 6, 1989No. 2-88-189-CVPublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LATTIMORE, Justice.

This is an appeal from a final judgment ordering appellant, Bumice Joe Birdo, take nothing from appellees, Dr. J.M. Holbrook, Sharon E. Nelon, and Tarrant County, Texas. Birdo has perfected this appeal from the judgment.

We affirm.

Birdo submitted a hand-printed brief to this court. Briefs “may be typewritten or printed.” TEX.R.APP.P. 74(j). The ordinary meaning of the word “print” may include either handprinting or the product of a printing press. WEBSTER’S NINTH NEW COLLEGIATE DICTIONARY 935 (1988); see also Hatch v. Turner, 145 Tex. 17, 20-21, 193 S.W.2d 668, 669…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Price v. JohnstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Robert Procup v. C. StricklandCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
  3. In Re McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. In Re Reverend Clovis Carl Green, JrCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
  5. Victory v. State of TexasTexas Supreme Court · 1942

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. In the Interest of Z.L.T.Texas Supreme Court · 2003
  2. In Re Ramirez, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
  3. Fibreboard Corp. v. PoolCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
  4. Armstrong v. Randle, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1994
  5. Stroud v. VBFSB Holding Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1996

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API