Legal Opinion
McLagan v. Granato
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided January 3, 1927No. 11,571PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Denison
Gbanato had a verdict and judgment against McLagan for taking and converting an automobile, and the latter brings error and moves for supersedeas. The judgment must be affirmed.
One Olson was a dealer in automobiles with a garage and salesroom in Pueblo. One Bronker had a storage garage next door. Olson bought .five automobiles for sale. He borrowed money of McLagan to pay for them and gave a chattel mortgage to secure the note. The mortgage provided for retention of possession by the mortgagor, who displayed them for sale in his said salesroom. A few days later the defendant demanded…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Wilson v. VoightSupreme Court of Colorado · 1886
- Colorado Springs & Interurban Railway Co. v. CohunSupreme Court of Colorado · 1919
- Martin v. CarruthersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1921
- Western Colorado Power Co. v. Gibson Lumber & Coal Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1918
- McGhee Investment Co. v. KirsherSupreme Court of Colorado · 1922
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bombardier Capital, Inc. v. Tinkler (In Re Tinkler)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 2004
- Byron v. York Investment CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 1956
- Parker v. PlymptonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928
- Brown v. Driverless Car Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1929
- Small v. ClarkSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.