Legal Opinion
Bombardier Capital, Inc. v. Tinkler (In Re Tinkler)
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado
Decided June 2, 2004No. 19-10945PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HOWARD R. TALLMAN, Bankruptcy Judge.
This case comes before the Court on Plaintiffs Amended Complaint for Determination that Debt is not Dischargeable [the “Amended Complaint”]. The matter was tried to the Court on March 29, 2004, and March 30, 2004. The Court has reviewed the evidence adduced at trial and has considered the arguments of the parties. It is now ready to rule.
Plaintiffs Amended Complaint states causes of action under 11 U.S.C. § 523 for nondischargeability of Defendant’s debt to Plaintiff due to: embezzlement or larceny, § 523(a)(4); and willful and malicious injury, §…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Kawaauhau v. GeigerSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Davis v. Aetna Acceptance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Tinker v. ColwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- GMAC Inc. v. Coley (In Re Coley)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- Cody Farms, Inc. v. Deerman (In re Deerman)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 2012
- Bank Calumet v. Whiters (In Re Whiters)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 2006
- Kraus Anderson Capital, Inc. v. Bradley (In re Bradley)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- MacArthur Co. v. Cupit (In re Cupit)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 2014
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.