Legal Opinion
Small v. Clark
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided January 9, 1928No. 11,803PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Denison
Clark, defendant below, had a verdict in an action by Mrs. Small against him for negligently causing an automobile collision whereby she was hurt. She brings error.
Upon the same facts, Small, husband of the present plaintiff, had a judgment against Clark for injuries to his car and for exemplary damages. Clark v. Small, 80 Colo. 227, 250 Pac. 385.
The essential facts are that Clark was driving his car Westward behind a Ford driven by a stranger; he tried to pass the Ford and in the attempt collided with a machine driven by Small, carrying the latter’s wife and several children. The negligence…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Colorado Mortgage & Investment Co. v. ReesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1895
- Colorado Mortgage & Investment Co. v. GiacominiSupreme Court of Colorado · 1913
- Crampton v. Ivie Bros.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
- Clark v. SmallSupreme Court of Colorado · 1926
- Denver & Rio Grande Railroad v. SipesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1899
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lewis v. La NierSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928
- Barlow v. North Sterling Irrigation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1929
- Brown v. MaierSupreme Court of Colorado · 1934
- Consolidated Truck Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1933