McGhee Investment Co. v. Kirsher
Supreme Court of Colorado
Action for damages and the cancellation of a promissory note. Judgment for defendant on his counterclaim. Error to the District Court of the City and County of Denver, Hon. Charles C. Butler, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Allen
The plaintiff below, The McGhee Investment Company, brought an action against the defendant, W. J. Kirsher, for damages for failure to return certain stock delivered as collateral security for a note, and to cancel the note, giving defendant credit for the principal and interest thereof, With reference to the transactions • which gave *138rise to the plaintiff’s alleged cause of action, the’ defendant filed an answer and counterclaim. The defendant obtained judgment on his counterclaim. The plaintiff brings the cause here for review.
Error is assigned to the court’s denying plaintiff’s motion for…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Saxton v. PerrySupreme Court of Colorado · 1910
- O'Brien v. Galley-Stockton Shoe Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1918
3Cited by6 opinions
- Parker v. PlymptonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928
- Gruber v. KleinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- McLagan v. GranatoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
- Carr v. WainwrightCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1930
- Parker v. PlymptonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.