Legal Opinion
Byron v. York Investment Company
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided April 30, 1956No. 17588PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Knauss
Plaintiff in error was defendant in the trial court and will be referred to as defendant, or as Lessor, or by name. Defendant in error was plaintiff in the lower court and will be referred to as plaintiff, or as Lessee, or York. Irving J. Hayutin, a Denver lawyer, president of York, was a principal witness at the trial and was one of the Trustees-Mortgagees in a chattel mortgage hereafter mentioned. He will be referred to as Hayutin.
Plaintiff York leased from Byron certain mining properties in Summit County, Colorado. The written lease was dated April 2, 1951. At the same time the Lessee…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lininger Implement Co. v. Queen City Foundry Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1923
- Martin v. SikesWashington Supreme Court · 1951
- McLagan v. GranatoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
- Davis v. PattersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1920
- Dorris v. San Luis Valley Finance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1932
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Itin v. UngarSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
- Bombardier Capital, Inc. v. Tinkler (In Re Tinkler)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 2004
- Colorado Kenworth Corporation v. WhitworthSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960
- Glenn Arms Associates v. Century Mortgage & Investment Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1984
- Armstrong Rubber Co. v. Anzman (In Re Anzman)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 1986
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.