Legal Opinion
State of California v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 12, 1986No. D004709PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WIENER, Acting P. J.
The office of the Attorney General, representing the State of California (State), seeks a writ of mandate or prohibition and a stay preventing the trial court from compelling the State to be joined as a defendant in this lawsuit.
Penal Code section 326.5 defines what constitutes a legal bingo game and makes it a misdemeanor to conduct bingo games except in accordance with the statute. St. Mary’s Catholic Church (Church) and Selectro-Vision, Limited have brought a civil action against the City of National City (City) in the superior court, seeking declaratory relief…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. Superior Court (Greer)California Supreme Court · 1977
- Laisne v. California State Board of OptometryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Goodenough v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Moore v. PanishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- People v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Perry v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- People v. KarrikerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Ass'n for L. A. Deputy Sheriffs v. Superior Court of Cal. ex rel. the Cnty. of L. A., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Brown v. GrosskopfAppellate Court of Illinois · 2013
- Assn. for L.A. Deputy Sheriffs v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2017
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.