Legal Opinion
Goodenough v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 12, 1971No. Civ. 11068PublishedCited by 102 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THE COURT.
Robin Goodenough (petitioner) seeks mandate to compel the superior court to set aside its judgment denying a writ of mandate and to enter judgment granting such writ.
The writ was sought to compel the real parties in interest, four members of the City Council of the City of Coronado and the city clerk of said city, to call a special election under the provisions of section 4022 of article 1 of chapter 3 of division 4 of the Elections Code.
The subject matter of chapter 3 is municipal elections having to do with the Initiative, Referendum and Freeholders’ Charter Amendments.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Farley v. HealeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Dauenhauer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Enyeart v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Struhm v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
3Cited by102 opinions
- Lewis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- United Nuclear Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Mitsui Manufacturers Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Zephyr Park, Ltd. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- San Diego Wholesale Credit Men's Ass'n. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.