Legal Opinion
Perry v. Brown
California Supreme Court
Decided November 17, 2011No. S189476PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CANTIL-SAKAUYE, C. J.
At the request of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, we agreed to decide a question of California law that is relevant to the underlying lawsuit in this matter now pending in that federal appellate court. (Perry v. Brown (9th Cir., No. 10-16696); see Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.548.) As posed by the Ninth Circuit, the question to be decided is “[w]hether under article II, section 8 of the California Constitution, or otherwise under California law, the official proponents of an initiative measure possess either a particularized interest in the…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. CunoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Arizonans for Official English v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Hollingsworth v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- People v. ValenciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- California Cannabis Coalition v. City of UplandCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- Perry v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- San Francisco Tomorrow v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.