Legal Opinion
Moore v. Panish
California Supreme Court
Decided October 18, 1982No. L.A. 31548PublishedCited by 89 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
REYNOSO, J.
The sole issue in this mandate proceeding is whether section 6402, subdivision (b) of the Elections Code1 prohibits petitioner *538from seeking election to his party’s county central committee and to the board of directors of a nonpartisan municipal water district at the same primary election.
We conclude that section 6402, by its terms, does not apply to selection of party county central committees. It follows that subdivision (b), which serves only to limit its application, as well does not apply to such a committee office. (See Narver v. Jordan (1916) 173 Cal. 424 [160 P.245].)
2Cases cited23 opinions
- United States v. ClassicSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Williams v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Bullock v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Smith v. AllwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Terry v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by89 opinions
- Mejia v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Johnson v. KnowlesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Walker v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Pacific Southwest Realty Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- People v. CiceroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.