Legal Opinion
Minnesota Hotel Co. v. Rosa Development Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided February 23, 1993No. C7-92-1569PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
Appellants Minnesota Hotel Company (f/ k/a Robert E. Woolley, Inc. or REW, Inc.), Robert E. Woolley, and Minneapolis Airport Hotel Associates (MAHA), sued respondents ROSA Development Company (ROSA), Carl D. Glickman, and Robert C. Muir for fraudulent misrepresentation, breach of fiduciary duty, breach of contract, negligent misrepresentation, and misuse of confidential information.
The trial court granted respondents’ motion for appointment of a receiver pursuant to the parties’ agreement. The trial court appointed appellants’ choice of receivers and required respondent…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Huggins v. Green Top Dairy Farms, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1954
- Edenfield v. CrispDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
- St. Louis Park Investment Co. v. R.L. Johnson Investment Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Mutual Benefit Life Insurance v. Frantz Klodt & Son, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Sibley County Bank v. Crescent Milling Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Equity Trust Co. Custodian FBO Heather Eisenmenger Ira v. ColeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
- State v. McKeeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1986
- Community First Bank v. First United Funding, LLCCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
- State Bank of Delano v. CenterPoint Energy Resources Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- MIF Realty v. PickettMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.