Community First Bank v. First United Funding, LLC
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CHUTICH, Judge.
Appellant, The National Bank (National Bank), appeals the district court’s distribution of funds recovered from a Ponzi scheme under a net-investment distribution method. Because the district court did not abuse its discretion in selecting that method, we affirm.
FACTS
Beginning in 2002, First United Funding, LLC (First United) and Corey Johnston sold loan participations to banks, promising impressive returns. A loan participation is a common banking practice in which a bank participant provides funds to a lender, which then lends the funds to a borrower. First United and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Cunningham v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Forex Asset Management LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- Securities Investor Protection Corp. v. Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC (In Re Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Topworth International, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- United States of America, and Claremont Properties, Inc., Intervenor/plaintiff-Appellant v. Jannette E. DurhamCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Greenpond South, LLC v. General Electric Capital Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
- Finn v. Alliance BankCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
- In re PearlmanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2012