Legal Opinion

St. Louis Park Investment Co. v. R.L. Johnson Investment Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 1, 1987No. C5-87-731PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NORTON, Judge.

This is an appeal regarding the obligation of respondent R.L. Johnson Investment Company to construct additional office space following the execution of a contract for deed for the sale of property to appellant St. Louis Park Investment Company. The trial court granted respondent’s summary judgment motion, finding no issues of material fact regarding either the obligation to construct office space or the duress that was alleged in executing the contract for deed. The St. Louis Park Investment Company appeals. We affirm.

FACTS

In July 1984, Twinco Automotive Warehouse, Inc.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bennett v. Storz Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  2. Wise v. Midtown Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  3. National Auto Brokers Corp. v. Aleeda Development Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Bond v. CharlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  5. Puget Sound Power & Light Co. v. ShulmanWashington Supreme Court · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Dunes Hospitality, L.L.C. v. Country Kitchen International, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Johnson v. Hubbard Broadcasting, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1996
  3. Timothy Olmsted v. Saint Paul Public SchoolsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
  4. International Travel Arrangers v. NWA, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1989
  5. Minnesota Hotel Co. v. Rosa Development Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API