Legal Opinion

United States v. Great Neck Saw Mfrs., Inc.

United States Court of International Trade

Decided October 22, 2018No. Slip Op.18-144; Court 17-00049Published

1Opinion of the Court

Gordon, Judge:

Before the court is the USCIT Rule 37 motion by Plaintiff United States (the "Government") to compel discovery responses from Defendant Great Neck Saw Manufacturers, Inc. ("GNSM"). See Pl.'s Mot. to Compel Disc. Resps., ECF No. 31 ("Pl.'s Mot."); see also Def.'s Mem. In Opp. to Pl.'s Mot. to Compel Disc., August 6, 2018, ECF No. 32 ("Def.'s Resp."). For the reasons set forth below, the Government's motion is denied without prejudice.

I. Background

GNSM is an importer and manufacturer of hand tools, including screwdrivers, saws, levels, layout tools, knives, and flashlights…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Benavidez v. Sandia National LaboratoriesDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2017
  2. Cotracom Commodity Trading Co. v. Seaboard Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 1999
  3. Doe v. National Hemophilia FoundationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2000
  4. Williams v. Sprint/United Mgmt. Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API