Legal Opinion

Doe v. National Hemophilia Foundation

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided June 6, 2000No. CIV.A. No. WMN-98-3006PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

GESNER, United States Magistrate Judge.

This case has been referred to the undersigned for the resolution of discovery disputes pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rule 301. Plaintiff, a hemophiliac, alleges that he contracted the hepatitis C virus through infusion of tainted coagulation products manufactured and/or distributed by defendants and is suing for damages.1 Pending are Plaintiffs Motion to Compel Answers to Plaintiffs First Set of Interrogatories and Request for Production of Documents and Motion for Extension of Fact and Expert Discovery Deadlines,…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Witt v. GC Services Ltd. PartnershipDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2014
  2. Ayers v. Continental Casualty Co.District Court, N.D. West Virginia · 2007
  3. Oklahoma v. Tyson Foods, Inc.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2009
  4. Devon Mobile Communications Liquidating Trust v. Adelphia Communications Corp. (In Re Adelphia Communications Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2005
  5. MJM Yachts LLC v. Ram Investments of South Florida IncDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API