Cotracom Commodity Trading Co. v. Seaboard Corp.
District Court, D. Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
RUSHFELT, United States Magistrate Judge.
The court has under consideration Defendant Seaboard Corporation’s Motion to Compel Discovery from Plaintiffs and for Sanctions (doc. 108). Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 37, defendant seeks an order to compel plaintiffs to comply with this court’s order of May 6, 1998, and to respond to Defendants’ Second Request for Production of Documents. It also seeks sanctions against plaintiffs. Plaintiffs oppose the motion. By letter they ask the court to permit oral argument. The court finds no need for oral argument. It thus denies the request.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hertenstein v. Kimberly Home Health Care, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1999
3Cited by44 opinions
- Compass Bank v. ShamgochianDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2012
- Hoelzel v. First Select Corp.District Court, D. Colorado · 2003
- Myers v. Colgate-Palmolive Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 2000
- John B. v. GoetzDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2010
- Manning v. General MotorsDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2007
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.