Williams v. Sprint/United Mgmt. Co.
District Court, D. Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WAXSE, United States Magistrate Judge.
Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Second Motion to Declare Invalid Defendant Sprint’s Assertions of Privilege where Legal Counsel Was Not Involved (doc. 3595). For the reasons stated below, Plaintiffs’ Motion will be granted in part and denied in part.
I. Relevant Procedural Background
On or about August 25, 2005, Defendant provided to Plaintiffs an updated privilege log. At the September 1, 2005 status conference, Plaintiffs submitted to the Court a document entitled “List of Documents Withheld by Defendant Despite No Involvement…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Linde Thomson Langworthy Kohn & Van Dyke, P.C. v. Resolution Trust CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
- Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. v. The Honorable Lee R. West, Professional Asset Management v. Penn Square BankCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Beteselassie v. Porcelana Corona de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.District Court, D. Kansas · 2022
- Black v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2025
- JENNIFER CAEDRAN SULLIVAN v. USD 512 SHAWNEE MISSION, et al.District Court, D. Kansas · 2026
- Mai v. CSAA Fire & Casualty Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2020
- United States v. Great Neck Saw Mfrs., Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 2018