Legal Opinion
National Labor Relations Board v. The Joclin Manufacturing Company
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 1, 1963No. 154, Docket 27675PublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRIENDLY, Circuit Judge.
The National Labor Relations Board seeks enforcement of an order, 137 NL RB No. 23, determining that respondent Joclin Manufacturing Company, which is engaged in the manufacture and interstate sale of plastics and related products at Wallingford, Conn., violated § 8(a) (1) and (5) of the National Labor Relations Act by refusing to bargain with United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum & Plastic Workers of America, AFL-CIO, hereafter the Union, which had been certified after a consent election as the bargaining representative of a unit of Joclin’s employees. The sole issue is the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Leedom v. KyneSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- American Federation of Labor v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Goldsmith v. United States Board of Tax AppealsSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- National Labor Relations Board v. O. K. Van Storage, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Tennessee Packers, Inc., Frosty Morn DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1967
- J. R. Norton Co. v. Agricultural Labor Relations BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- National Labor Relations Board v. Smith Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- National Labor Relations Board v. Bata Shoe Company, Inc., United Shoe Workers of America, Afl-Cio, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
- National Labor Relations Board v. Sun Drug Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.