Legal Opinion

Goldsmith v. United States Board of Tax Appeals

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 1, 1926No. 320PublishedCited by 232 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Taft

H. Ely Goldsmith, a citizen of New York and qualified to practice as a Codified Public Accountant by certificate issued under the laws of that State, filed a petition in the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia asking for a writ of mandamus against the United States Board of Tax Appeals created by the Revenue Act of 1924, 43 Stat. 253, 336, Title IX, § 900, to compel the Board to enroll him as an attorney with the right to practice before it; and to enjoin the Board from interfering with his appearance before it in behalf of tax-payers whose interests are there being dealt with.

The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Manning v. FrenchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
  2. People ex rel. Goldschmidt v. TravisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
  3. People Ex Rel. Goldschmidt v. . TravisNew York Court of Appeals · 1916

3Cited by232 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners of NMSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Mitchell v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974

227 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API