Legal Opinion

Baker v. Planning Board of Framingham

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 12, 1967PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKirk, J.

In the Superior Court the judge entered a decree that the planning board of Framingham (the board) had exceeded its authority in disapproving the definitive plan for the subdivision of approximately eleven acres of land owned by the plaintiff (Baker 1 ). The decree annulled the decision of the board and directed that it promptly take further proceedings under the subdivision control law consistent with the applicable statutes and the decree. See Daley Constr. Co. Inc. v. Planning Bd. of Randolph, 340 Mass. 149, 156; Pieper v. Planning Bd. of Southborough, 340 Mass. 157, 164; Doliner v.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Daley Construction Co. v. Planning Board of RandolphMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
  2. Pieper v. PLANNING BOARD OF SOUTHBOROUGH.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
  3. Doliner v. Planning Board of MillisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
  4. Madigan v. McCannMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1963
  5. Lukas v. LeventhalMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Framingham Clinic, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  2. Canter v. Planning Board of WestboroughMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1976
  3. Beale v. Planning BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  4. United Reis Homes, Inc. v. Planning Board of NatickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
  5. Selectmen of Ayer v. PLANNING BOARD OF AYERMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1975

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API