Lukas v. Leventhal
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the Court
Decree affirmed with costs of this appeal. 'An appeal from a final decree brings to us this case wherein no appeal had been taken from an interlocutory decree confirming, and overruling exceptions to, a master’s report and report on recommittal. Therefore, the only questions presented are whether the findings of the master are mutually inconsistent or plainly wrong (Flynn v. Korsack, 343 Mass. 15, 17, and eases cited), and whether the decree is within the scope of the pleadings and supported by the facts found. Regan v. Tierney, 306 Mass. 168,170, and eases cited. No error in these respects…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Flynn v. KorsackMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
- Shaw v. United Cape Cod Cranberry Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955
- Regan v. TierneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
3Cited by6 opinions
- Jones v. GingrasMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1975
- Rose v. HomseyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
- Baker v. Planning Board of FraminghamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
- Town of Boxborough v. Joatham Spring Realty TrustMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1969
- Madigan v. McCannMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.