Legal Opinion

Kaiman Realty, Inc. v. Carmichael

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1982No. 7431PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

In an action for specific performance, under an agreement of sale, filed by the plaintiff-appellant Raiman Realty against defendants-appellees Carmichael, Langas, and Morrow, the trial court denied specific performance but granted other relief. The trial court determined that time was of the essence and that the buyer, Raiman Realty, had failed to perform in a timely fashion. Accordingly, it denied Raiman Realty’s request for specific performance. The intermediate court of appeals affirmed the court’s denial of specific performance but reversed and remanded for further consideration of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. WiseHawaii Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Rothenberg v. FollmanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. Lum v. StevensHawaii Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Kaiman Realty, Inc. v. CarmichaelHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Kaiman Realty, Inc. v. CarmichaelHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1981

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Brown v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. K. M. Young & Associates, Inc. v. CieslikHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Thompson v. McCannSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2000
  4. Scotella v. OsgoodHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. PR Pension Fund v. NakadaHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API