Legal Opinion

Thompson v. McCann

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided November 6, 2000No. 99-288-AppealPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

A judgment for specific performance of a purchase and sale agreement (agreement) has caused the defendants, Doreen A. McCann (McCann) and Midwest Electric Corporation (Midwest) (collectively, sellers) 1 to prosecute this appeal. They contend that the Superior Court erred in (1) finding that they had breached the agreement, and (2) granting this remedy. Because the parties included a “time is of the essence” clause in the agreement, the sellers suggest that the trial justice should have strictly enforced the agreement’s May 27, 1998°, closing date against the plaintiff-buyer, James J.…

3Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Eastern Motor Inns, Inc. v. RicciSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1989
  3. Haxton's of Riverside, Inc. v. Windmill Realty, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1985
  4. Rothenberg v. FollmanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. Safeway System, Inc. v. Manuel Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1967

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by16 opinions

  1. Lajayi v. FafiyebiSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2004
  2. Fisher v. ApplebaumSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008
  3. 1800 Smith Street Associates, LP v. GencarelliSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2005
  4. Empire Acquisition Group, LLC v. Atlantic Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2012
  5. Fracassa v. DorisSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2005

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API