Legal Opinion

Scotella v. Osgood

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

Decided February 17, 1983No. 8155; CIVIL NO. 2030PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

BURNS, C.J.

Plaintiffs-Appellants Frank D. Scotella and Gordon Randolph Logan (Buyers) sued defendants-appellees Bradley D. Osgood, II, Joyce A. Osgood, and Beatrice K. Osgood (Sellers) for specific performance of a land purchase contract. The trial court denied specific performance and Buyers appeal. We reverse.

The dispositive issue is whether in a land purchase contract 1 where time is of the essence the Buyers’ failure to perform on time prevents them from obtaining specific performance. In light of Kaiman Realty, Inc. v. Carmichael, 65 Haw. 637, 655 P.2d 872 (1982),…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. WiseHawaii Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Hing Bo Gum v. Mataichi NakamuraHawaii Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Title Guaranty Escrow Services, Inc. v. PowleyHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Kaiman Realty, Inc. v. CarmichaelHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Anderson v. Oceanic Properties, Inc.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Aickin v. Ocean View Investments Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Shanghai Inv. Co., Inc. v. Alteka Co., Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  3. K. M. Young & Associates, Inc. v. CieslikHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. PR Pension Fund v. NakadaHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Bloudell v. Wailuku Sugar Co.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API